![jgnash vs gnucash jgnash vs gnucash](https://www.saashub.com/images/app/context_images/30/fd4c1d093372/jgnash-alternatives-medium.png)
But at least I get a reminder, and all in one place I control. I love the reminders! For debts with variable amounts, I usually just set the amount to 9999.99 and then accept everything, and my balance stays RED until I fill in the actual amounts. It is amazing to be able to transfer stuff from account to account without jumping through hoops. It is great to have a tree architecture to organize all the accounts. I keep track of my checking, saving, assets, stocks and retirement accounts (13), my joint accounts with my wife (4) and my custodial accounts for my uncle (4). That being said, my flash drive is now 4GB so that isn't as big an issue, but I do save my data files to a TrueCrypt volume that lives on DropBox, so size still matters.
JGNASH VS GNUCASH UPDATE
I'm currently on version 2.12.0 (30MB) and getting ready to update to 2.13.5 (41MB). It used to be one java jar, now it is a whole suite and I doubt that it would even fit. It is not the svelt little program I used to carry around on my 64MB Lexar Jump dirve. I have used this app in many incarnations for over 6 years now, way back when it was small (2MB). I created a security to test managing mutual funds, but after creating it could not see where it went and at this point decided not to pursue the review further. Presumably user error, but I could not intuit anything I was doing wrong. When I entered a transaction, then modified it to split the expense categories, the modification seemed to be ignored. E.g., when you start to type in a payee, when the option is unique you'll be able to autocomplete the name, but no selection prior to uniqueness the previous amount is filled in, but the account (expense category) is not made to match the previous transaction. In the balance sheet system, you enter a transaction into one account and and specify that it comes from/goes to another account, usually an expense account such as groceries. I.e., in a bank account oriented system, you enter a transaction for an account and describe it with a category. Non-accountants may find the balance sheet orientation rather than bank account orientation off putting. Initial balance should be, but is not a property of accounts.
![jgnash vs gnucash jgnash vs gnucash](https://i0.wp.com/mount-kinabalu-borneo.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/grisbi-sc.jpg)
Several UI items are not intuitive: E.g., when you are in an account and click "New" there is no visual feedback. When you first start a project you have to "configure your database" (for a non-techy not user friendly language).
![jgnash vs gnucash jgnash vs gnucash](https://www.saashub.com/images/app/context_images/4/2b9cc6b16d8d/money-dashboard-alternatives-medium.png)
JGNASH VS GNUCASH SOFTWARE
Requires approving use of 8 software licenses. jGnash is run as a java command - not added to your Start menu. If the do-it-yourself-with-Excel path isn't to your capability (or liking), then it's time to take a look at some other software that's available.Requires installation of Java 6.0 first. (I just happen to offer a Check Register spreadsheet, if you're interested.) And probably not many folks would have the patience to pull it off. This, however, could take a great amount of time.
JGNASH VS GNUCASH FREE
If you're adept at building spreadsheets, you could conceivably use Excel or Calc (the OpenOffice free spreadsheeting program) to build a bare-bones facsimile of Quicken-esque, check-register lookalike spreadsheets. So if you want to start managing your money seriously, and Quicken or Money aren't on your radar, what are the alternatives? It's another thing entirely for someone to actually have the forty, fifty, or sixty bucks to go out and purchase it. It's fine for me to sit here and recommend Quicken to everybody within earshot. But for most folks, that's simply not throwaway change. For me, it's worth every penny of that price. If I recall correctly, I paid something close to $55 for my Quicken Deluxe 2005. (Keeps me "closer" to my spending, and my spending habits, is the way I see it.)Īnother issue: Intuit (makers of Quicken) and Microsoft (former makers of Money, which is no longer produced) aren't exactly giving their software away. I am so demented, and so anal, that I actually enter every single money transaction by hand. Personally, I have never once used the "downloadable transaction" thing on any version of Quicken I've ever owned. I get the feeling that when people do have problems with Quicken and Money, it tends to originate with the downloadable-transactions features of both. The problems I kept encountering with previous versions have been fixed, as far as I can tell. When those bugs reared their ugly heads - always at the most inopportune times - it was almost enough to make me look for other solutions. I suppose that's understandable, as I had issues with previous versions of Quicken. Turns out she was already a user of the program, but had become pretty frustrated with it. Last week a reader emailed me with a question: Did I know of any good alternatives to Microsoft Money?